Loading stock data...
Media 6b596111 c67b 4e5a b2a4 5c981ab515a0 133807079768603990

EU Securities and Markets Authority Publishes Final Guidance on MiCA Legislation

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has released its final guidance report for member states making the transition to the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation. The report is designed to provide clarity on the implementation of MiCA regulations, which began taking effect in June 2024, with a final deadline scheduled for December 30.

A Surge in Stablecoin Market Under MiCA Guidance

As reported by Cointelegraph, the stablecoin market has seen significant growth under the guidance of MiCA. However, as recently as December 10, at least six European Union member states – Belgium, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Luxembourg, and Romania – were reporting difficulties in meeting the end-of-year deadline due to uncertainty and a lack of regulatory clarity in the initial MiCA documents.

ESMA’s Final Guidance Report: Addressing Regulatory Uncertainty

The final guidance report from ESMA highlights the need for further clarity on specific criteria and conditions while also addressing concerns about the potential administrative burden that the draft guidelines might impose. The report states:

"Stakeholders generally appreciated the clarity of the draft guidelines and the comprehensive approach taken by ESMA. Several respondents highlighted the need for further clarity on specific criteria and conditions, while others expressed concerns about the potential administrative burden the draft guidelines might impose."

Regulatory Uncertainty: A Common Concern

Member states and industry stakeholders were actively engaged in the commentary period between association reports with participation from dozens of member states and stakeholders. The feedback resulted in ESMA guidance on 12 distinct concerns, with the majority relating to clarifying classifications for specific assets and their legal use.

Diverging Interpretations Across Member States

One of the primary concerns was that member states would arrive at different interpretations of many MiCA laws due to insufficient explanations. This could lead to ‘diverging interpretations across member states’ as highlighted by ESMA, adding:

"Several respondents highlighted the potential for legal uncertainty due to the scope of the guidelines and the way the conditions and criteria detailed in the guidelines could be understood by NCAs [national competent authorities]."

Addressing Concerns with Explanatory Scenarios

To address these concerns, the ESMA included a series of explanatory scenarios covering various aspects of digital asset regulation under MiCA. However, as noted in the report, MiCA has declined to provide ‘real-world’ examples because the guidelines cannot express an opinion on the classification of specific cryptocurrencies or similar assets.

Guidance on MiFID II

The report also addressed concerns over the EU’s Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) guidance. MiFID II was rolled out after the 2008 global financial crisis to standardize financial practices across the bloc. Member states are calling for an update to the regulation to include a clear definition of crypto assets as financial instruments.

A Balanced Approach to Regulation

In response, the ESMA’s guidance suggests providing additional clarity on MiFID II rules without changing the definition of financial instruments. This would presumably strike a balance between determining the conditions and criteria used to classify crypto-assets and enabling a ‘one size fits all’ approach to regulation.

Member States’ Concerns

Member states also worried that there wasn’t enough clarity in the MiCA laws for them to make determinations on which assets were legally transferable, how to promote and ensure ‘technology neutrality’ under the current rules, and how classifications such as ‘securities,’ ‘derivatives,’ and emission allowances applied across different crypto-asset types.

Continuous Collaboration

Despite this being the Final Guidance Report ahead of the December 30 deadline, the ESMA wrote throughout the 49-page document that it would continue to work with lawmakers and stakeholders to develop further clarity without changing the letter of the laws.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Crypto Regulation

As the regulatory landscape continues to evolve, it is essential for member states and industry stakeholders to stay informed about the latest developments. By subscribing to our Law Decoded newsletter, you can arm yourself with the latest on crypto laws and guidelines to make smart choices for your crypto ventures.

Subscribe now and receive a weekly digest of articles like this one, delivered right to your inbox every Monday.

By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Related Articles

  • EU markets watchdog urges amendments to MiCA crypto regulations
  • 13 Christmas gifts that Bitcoin and crypto degens will love

Magazine: Explore More Articles Like This

Stay up-to-date with the latest news, trends, and insights in the world of cryptocurrency and blockchain. Our magazine features a wide range of articles on topics such as:

  • Crypto regulation
  • Blockchain technology
  • Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs)
  • Tokenization

Subscribe now and receive a weekly digest of articles like this one, delivered right to your inbox every Monday.

By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Screen Shot 2023 09 27 at 12.33.24 PM 1 Previous post Meta and Spotify CEOs Criticize Proposed EU Regulations on Artificial Intelligence Development
a168928171a9653a66d38f6c5e666beb 1 Next post Hoth Therapeutics Reports 100% Success Rate in Phase 2a Trial for HT-001 to Combat Cancer Treatment Side Effects